Skip to main content

Simple Resistor For IV Converter AD1865 DAC

On my previous DAC built, the another ultimate DAC build here is basically an oversampling AD1865 DAC using CDX1144, then the current signal from DAC will going to the replaceable module called the IV & LPF combo module. This DAC is including a simple headphone amplifier that was initially built for experimenting various type of IV and LPF, then by using a headphone, I can carefully study how those modules effect to the sound quality.

But I never did it anyway:)

So I think, this is the first time I open it up again since the very first time built. Right now I will testing one simple method of DAC IV converter using only a resistor per channel.

I am really curious how the sound quality with it.


The working principal to convert from current to voltage is as simple as implementing the ohm law.

Using a resistor from each channel DAC output, in this case the pin 4 for I out right channel and pin 21 for I out left channel goes to the ground.

This method is actually common in most vacuum tube output DAC, which the IV converter is using a resistor per channel, than because the signal is so weak, then the vacuum tube back it up to certain level that power amplifier can drive. Typically is 2 volt.

But in this test, I only using a resistor per channel as an IV converter, without any gain stage, then goes to a simple L-C LPF using series 220uH inductor and 10nF capacitor to ground.

And this is the previously IV and LPF combo module using op-amps. It using a socket pins that's makes this experimenting proses become easier.


For the IV converter resistor, I tried various value resistors from 330 ohm to 100 ohm.

I found that the higher the value, more loud the signal output. But it has some drawbacks.

The sound with higher resistor value more rough and bass dominated, while smaller value give more smoothness in overall frequency band.


I end up with using 240 ohm resistor per channel as an IV converter. This gives me the balance between the loudness and the smoothness of the sound quality.

The resistors I using in this test is Susumu thin film resistor.


I fixed the layout by directly soldered to the main board.

And this is how I did it.





I evaluate this method for a week, with many songs I played. I can assure that using this simple resistor as an DAC IV converter give more pronounce in the mid-range. It is more forward and warm sounding but a little bit raw, un-polished sound.

The smoothness is gone, the dynamic a little bit bottle up, and the frequency range is more limited because now only using as simple L-C LPF only.

Nothing perfect I guess. Using op-amps is more reliable and give a smooth sounding experience, while using simple resistor as an IV converter also gives more pronounce in the mid-range.

After all it is a good example for experimenting a new things in this DAC world.

Cheers.

Disclaimer: Any statement and photos in this article are not allowed to copy or publish without written permission from the writer. Any injury or loss from following tips in this article is not under writer responsibility.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OPA1622 Vs. OPA627 High Performance Op-amps Comparison

This op-amps comparison topic is actually boring, but at the same time, many of us still curious about what others think about it. The reason is simply because of the op-amps variation are hundreds and they are depends by the implementation. The op-amps are considerably cheap and an interchangeable electronic components but they are not built for the same function. So in this discussion, I will focus on the modern Vs. vintage high performance op-amps in the simple non-inverting pre-amplifier gain stage.

Vintage Multibit R2R DAC Tier List

At the very beginning of this year, I committed to explore the best multi-bit R2R DAC. This is simply because I have plenty of the resources (from broken old unit CD player of course) and ability to build them up. If you think this kind a recycle from old un-used unit to become something useful, than I should stated myself giving contribute for greener world:) After all DAC that I built in this year, I think it is better for me to list them up again in one single page like this. Then I will rank them up in a simple tier list. The reason for this, so you all know what my opinion about of those vintage multibit R2R DAC especially in the sound quality.

PCM56 R2R Non Oversampling DAC Built

From early this year, I am start to playing a lot with the multibit DAC. They are from Sony CDP TDA1541A here , Nakamichi DAC-101 dual TDA1541S1 here , Clarion DRX-9255EXL PCM1702 here  and Clarion HX-D1 PCM1704 here . What I said playing with them is actually more suitable words because none of them are built by myself. I only study and exploring those unit then make some upgrade especially on the power supply components, signal capacitors upgrade, and bypassing the unused internal circuit for more clearer yet natural sound quality. This upgrade make a lot improvement compare to the first time I listen from it and I can really enjoy what the designer from each manufacture deliver the sound they would like to perform in those units. Those said units are categorized as a parts of hi-end audio system and I really now familiar with the sound signature from each of them. But to be honest, I am not satisfy yet with this condition. Because none of them is built by myself from ground up. ...