Skip to main content

DAC LPF Op-amps Comparison OPA1642 NE5532 LM4562

My multibit DAC built here and here sound wonderful.

Previously I did some changes especially in all technical aspect and evaluate the sound quality improvement from that changes. Like in this post, the DAC is dual PCM56P then using internal IV converter to the LPF section.

The LPF section in every DAC is very critical. The good calculated LPF can reveal the DAC sound potential because no digital glitch occurs on the analog output. The LPF is not only made by the combination of the resistors and capacitor network, but the op-amp become the major factor to the sound improvement.

So in this post, I will review some op-amp that more suitable in this DAC LPF section.


The op-amp I am using here is the most popular types and they having many good review from DIY community.

The photo above is the TI NE5532P. This is one of my favorite op-amp for ages.

Previously I am using BB OPA1642. This is the best technical specification and the most expensive among them. The price is US$ 3 compare to NE5532P is less than US$ 1 each.

The new contender is National Semiconductor LM4562, the price in in the middle of both two.


All op-amps in this test are DIP except the OPA1642 is in SOIC package. This means I should using the SOIC converter to DIP to fit into the socket.


I am using OPA1642 at the first time I finished this PCM56 DAC built a month ago. They are both from the same company which is the Burr-brown and I am enjoying the sound quality so much from this combination.

Then I curious how good is US$ 1 op-amp?

I change the op-amp with the very popular NE5532P and I am quite surprise for the result. This cheap op-amp is the most natural sounding op-amp compare to the bright sounding OPA1642.

The OPA1642 has more open at the high frequency, it is more detail but it noticeable sharp and edgy sound. When I do serious listening test between them, just an A - B testing, not back and forth, I found the OPA1642 creates more noise at upper frequency because of those high frequency details. Then I also experience the mid range of this OPA1642 is more laid back and the presentation is more natural, which is quite good in my opinion. The imaging is also very good, the pin point instruments are separated clearly. This is also with the large sound stage on overall music presentation.

The NE5532P in my opinion has the smooth high frequency presentation. This not attenuate the details of the music at the high frequency but instead, those detail is still reveal as is. I like the mid range presentation from this cheap op-amp. It is slightly warm but still maintain the natural vocal presentation without too much coloration in the sound. While this NE5532 surprisingly still having good imaging on every instruments and I guess it is lots better than the OPA1642 for long listening session. The soundstage somehow not as large as the OPA1642, but it is still in the good level of soundstage presentation.

The latest op-amp that I am still using until now is LM4562. Some say it is the same as LME49720, but anyway this LM4562 is lot cheaper. The sound difference after using NE5532P to this LM4562 is somehow so much different. Especially on the sound-stage and overall music presentation is more forward with this LM4562. It is not a wider sound stage among those previous op-amps I have tested. I also feels the music is more focus in the center. This creating superior imaging for the vocal while sacrifice the wider music sound-stage and music presentation. The high frequency are more open, more detail than NE5532P but still maintain smoother presentation compares to the OPA1642. On my long listening session, I like how this LM4562 creating the sound more focus on the presentation on the music.

So I think there is no absolute winner in this comparison. I am now using LM4562 just because I want evaluate it longer. Personally I like NE5532P more than all. This is still the best op-amp to the price while the OPA1642 is not really suit my personal music taste.

This review is totally subjective. I listen each op-amps in a weeks then immediate change it to another. What I can suggest when do this op-amps rolling, stick to one op-amps that you familiar with, like me is the NE5532P, then do the sound comparison to the new one.

Disclaimer: Any statement and photos in this article are not allowed to copy or publish without written permission from the writer. Any injury or loss from following tips in this article is not under writer responsibility.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OPA1622 Vs. OPA627 High Performance Op-amps Comparison

This op-amps comparison topic is actually boring, but at the same time, many of us still curious about what others think about it. The reason is simply because of the op-amps variation are hundreds and they are depends by the implementation. The op-amps are considerably cheap and an interchangeable electronic components but they are not built for the same function. So in this discussion, I will focus on the modern Vs. vintage high performance op-amps in the simple non-inverting pre-amplifier gain stage.

Vintage Multibit R2R DAC Tier List

At the very beginning of this year, I committed to explore the best multi-bit R2R DAC. This is simply because I have plenty of the resources (from broken old unit CD player of course) and ability to build them up. If you think this kind a recycle from old un-used unit to become something useful, than I should stated myself giving contribute for greener world:) After all DAC that I built in this year, I think it is better for me to list them up again in one single page like this. Then I will rank them up in a simple tier list. The reason for this, so you all know what my opinion about of those vintage multibit R2R DAC especially in the sound quality.

TDA1543 DAC Review In 2021

It is a fine day and as usual I am reading and searching online contents related to almost anything I like. During my search, I stop to the few online forum discuss about a simple DAC using TDA1543 DAC IC. The discussion about this DAC was about 3 years ago, and the latest was about a year ago. Quite new and overall discussion about this DAC sound quality mostly are positive. It is interesting topic anyway especially I was built this TDA1543 DAC long time ago in 2016. At that time, I combine this DAC with Tripath amplifier  here  and  here  before it sold in 2019. That is also my first DIY DAC and I am quite enjoyed this DAC so much, at that time. The background story about this, previously I was using Sony Playstation SCPH-1002 as my reference CD Player. The reason I moved to this TDA1543 DAC is because the CD optic inside the Playstation is wear out and I cannot find the replacement for it. I pretty remember the sound quality of this TDA1543 DAC is quite comparable...